Question
A point charge of is placed in free space. Find the electric field intensity at a point located 0.3 m from the charge. Also state the direction of the field.
Solution — Step by Step
We have and .
The value of Coulomb’s constant is .
The electric field due to a point charge is:
This formula gives the magnitude of the field. Direction is handled separately — never mix them into the arithmetic.
Since is positive, the field at points radially outward — away from the charge, directly along the line joining to .
If were negative, the direction reverses: the field would point toward the charge. The magnitude formula stays identical either way.
Why This Works
Coulomb’s law tells us that the force between two charges falls off as — this is the inverse square law, the same pattern as gravity. The electric field is just the force per unit positive test charge (), so it inherits that same dependence.
The in the denominator is critical. Every time you double the distance, the field becomes four times weaker. This is why problems often ask you to compare fields at different distances — the ratio trick is faster than recalculating each time.
We use instead of the full form for speed. Both are correct; in board exams, either notation is accepted.
Alternative Method
In JEE, when the charge is given in and distance in cm or m, convert units first and keep powers of 10 separate. This prevents arithmetic errors under pressure.
We can also express and use :
This route is longer for numericals but necessary when questions give you directly or ask about fields inside a medium (where gets replaced by ).
For this problem, the shortcut gives the same answer: .
Common Mistake
Students often forget to square the distance. Writing instead of is the single most common error in NCERT-type numericals. Here, using instead of gives — off by a factor of 3.33. Always check: the denominator must have , not .
A second trap: mixing up the unit of charge. means , not (that would be milliCoulombs). In CBSE 2023 and JEE Main 2022, several students lost marks purely on this conversion.